Lily Allen is Bazaar
8 Apr
I don’t really have much use for Lily Allen. Does the girl sing? Does she act? I’m pretty sure that she sings as, from what I’ve ever seen of her, she’s trying to be just like Katy Perry. But, when this girl takes her clothes off, I forget all the nasty things I ever thought about her and think “SHA-ZAM! That girl is hot!” But now Harper’s Bazaar is taking a truly bizarre twist.
The magazine has taken a photo of Lily in which she poses topless, wearing devil horns, and holding a cigarette. The picture was originally part of a photo shoot Lily did for Harper’s Bazaar Russia back in December but the Australian version of the magazine has given it a new twist. They’ve ditched the cig and have painted the picture rather than just posting the original on the cover. David Bromley was the masterpiece for the cover shot of Harper’s Bazaar Australia and while I must say that he caught Lily’s tits in their finest form, I’m also confused. Why a painting? Why not just use the original picture? Is it a legal thing? They didn’t have rights to the original piece? I’m not really too sure. Maybe they figured there are a lot of people like me and that we don’t actually want to look at Lily Allen – just her beautiful tatas.
Here we’ve given you the painting of Lily, the original picture from the photo shoot, and one more pic from the original shoot. That last pic doesn’t impress me all that much. It’s a whole lot of Lily and not nearly enough boob!
No related posts.
No comments yet